Sir Paul Coleridge, one of the country’s most senior divorce judges, is to launch a pro-marriage pressure group.
The initiative, whose aim is to promote marriage and discourage divorce, is being supported by several MPs and campaigners.
The High Court judge believes marriage is better for children than
cohabitation and is against divorce. His message is “mend it, don’t end
it.”
Sir Paul, who sits in the High Court Family Division as Mr Justice Coleridge, will launch The Marriage Foundation in the spring.
It will be backed by influential legal figures and aims to provide
information on the strengths of marriage, commission research and
organise conferences. It will eventually lobby for pro-marriage
policies.
This is, of course, a good idea, but it’s an aim shared by all
dedicated divorce lawyers. There is, perhaps, an assumption that
matrimonial law firms do little or nothing to persuade couples to stay
together because they don’t want to lose business.
This is entirely wrong. At Benussi & Co,
we do all we can to help clients rebuild their marriage rather than
dissolve it. If we believe there is even the slimmest chance the
relationship can be salvaged, we encourage the client to explore the
possibility of rebuilding, rather than dismantling, the marriage.
Only recently we were instructed by three separate clients – all
women – who had returned to us after gaps of three, seven and ten years
respectively. All had gone away, several years ago, to give their
marriages another go after we helped them realise there was hope for the
relationship.
Now they have returned – because, despite their best efforts, the marriages proved to be unsustainable in the long term.
Sometimes, partnerships can’t be mended and have to be ended.
The truth is that people aren’t prepared to put up with bad behaviour
as once they were. Women are no longer dependent upon men financially,
so can afford to strike out alone if they are unhappy in their marriage.
Women, even more than men, are reluctant to walk away from marriage
because they put so much into the relationships. When they do, finally,
decide enough is enough, you can be fairly sure they have tried
everything to make it work.
So, whilst Sir Paul’s pro-marriage foundation has to be a good thing,
he and his supporters have to understand that there are times when
“mend it, don’t end it” simply isn’t appropriate.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

1 comments:
Hear, hear.
It's quite remarkable that such a glib assesment could come from one of our most senior Judges.
Divorce can, after all, be extremely beneficial for an unhappy couple and their children. Better grow up with two happy parents than in an unhappy household.
Post a Comment